Thieler Law Corp advises investors with losses exceeding $100,000 of the June 9, 2015 lead plaintiff deadline in a class action lawsuit filed against Walgreen Company (NYSE: WAG)  (“Walgreens” or “the Company”). The suit is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and investors, who purchased Walgreens securities between March 25, 2014 and August 5, 2014, have until June 9, 2015 to move for lead plaintiff. You do not need to move for lead plaintiff to be a member of the Class.

If you purchased Walgreens securities during the Class Period, and have losses over $100,000, you may contact Thieler Law Corp by calling at (619) 866-6157 or emailing mail@thielerlaw.com.  No class has been certified in this case, and if your losses are less than $100,000 you are still a member of the class.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period defendants made false and misleading statements and/or allegedly failed to disclose adverse information regarding Walgreens' business and prospects, including the purported benefits of Walgreens' strategic partnership with Alliance Boots GmbH.  Specifically, defendants publicly announced goals for fiscal year 2016 of $1 billion in combined synergies and $9 to $9.5 billion in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT") for the combined entity, but concealed a $1.8 to $2.3 billion fiscal year 2016 earnings shortfall and the reasons for the shortfall from the investing public.

As a result of defendants' false and misleading statements and/or omissions during the Class Period, the price of Walgreens stock traded at artificially inflated prices, reaching a high of $76.08 per share.

On June 19, 2012, Walgreens announced that it had entered into a strategic partnership with Alliance Boots GmbH (“Alliance Boots”) to create a global pharmacy-led health and wellbeing enterprise (the “Walgreen-Alliance Boots Transaction”).

Defendants heralded the partnership as providing an unmatched supply chain, an unparalleled portfolio of health and wellness brands, and a unique platform in developed and emerging markets. The deal would occur in two parts. Under “Step One,” which took place in 2012, Walgreens acquired a 45% equity ownership stake in Alliance Boots in exchange for approximately $6.7 billion in cash and stock. Under “Step Two,” Walgreens acquired the remaining 55% on December 31, 2014 for approximately $5.3 billion in cash and 144.3 million shares of Walgreens’ common stock. Significantly, whereas the first step of the transaction did not require a shareholder vote, the second step did require shareholder approval.

In August 2012, after Step One of the Walgreen-Alliance Boots Transaction closed, the Company provided a set of publicly announced goals for fiscal year 2016 (“FY 2016 Goals”).  Defendants spoke about the benefits of the partnership and the FY 2016 Goals became critically important metrics that were regularly discussed by the Company and followed by analysts because they quantified the purported benefits of the merger and were important to assessing the merits of voting in favor of Step Two of the merger. The goals included $1 billion in combined synergies and $9 to $9.5 billion in adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”).

On August 6, 2014, Walgreens and Alliance Boots hosted an investor call. During the call, Gregory Wasson (“Wasson”), Walgreens former Chief Executive Officer, and Walgreens bundled the disclosure of the new FY 2016 EBIT goal, which finally revealed the amount of the massive shortfall that had been concealed during the Class Period and that the purported benefits of the merger were not nearly as robust as represented, with numerous optimistic statements.

Wasson disclosed that the Company was now tracking to a “mid-point” of $7.2 billion for FY 2016 EBIT, stating “we’re not happy about lowering our previous goals.” Wasson claimed “we have been challenged by the ongoing global pharmacy reimbursement pressure, which continues, and the rapid and pronounced increase in generic drug pricing, which we did not fully anticipate, and now expect to persist longer than we anticipated.” Wasson also finally disclosed the reason for the shortfall, stating that Walgreens had not been “able to fully mitigate [generic inflation] given the structure of certain existing contracts.”

On August 7, 2014, Cowen and Company reported that because the updated $7.2 billion EBIT estimate included a new $1 billion in cost savings that were additive to the previously disclosed $1 billion in synergies, Walgreens’ base business would be declining at a negative 4% CAGR over the next two years. This was far below the initial forecast of $9 to $9.5 billion back in August 2012 that appeared to be based on a positive CAGR. In addition, Cowen commented that “[m]anagement’s focus on the call around increased reimbursement pressures and generic inflation is a bit confusing to us, given this is not a new issue and shouldn’t come as such a surprise,” adding that “everyone has known about the issues of generic inflation” and “other players in the space have been able to more than compensate for these issues.”

After these disclosures, the Company’s stock price fell from a close of $69.12 per share on August 5, 2014 to a close of $59.21 per share on August 6, 2014, losing more than 14% of the value of the share price.

If you were negatively impacted by your investment in Walgreens securities between March 25, 2014 and August 5, 2014 and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, please contact us for your no-cost evaluation.

Thieler Law Corp purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. If you send us information, note that does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm.

Thieler Law Corp

2534 State Street - Suite 406,

San Diego, CA 92101

by

email: mail@thielerlaw.com 

or

telephone at +1 (619) 377 - 4324

or

visit our website http://www.thielerlaw.com/ 

or

Facsimile: +1 (619) 785 – 3185